THE YEAR IN REVIEW - 2002
By Alex Good
December 31, 2002
Another year has passed in the life of the literary Web-site that just refuses to
go away. Sure there are other sites out there that look prettier and are better
behaved, but goodreports.net still manages to hold its own. There were
over 200,000 visits in 2002, and traffic is still on the rise. Just for an independent Canadian book
site/personal home page! Why?
My best guess: A lack of alternatives. To be honest, when I launched this
thing I called it "Canada's Premier Independent Book Site" simply
because I didn't know of any others. Any others. And things haven't
improved much. I've included some excellent places to start browsing on my
home page, but it isn't a
long list. It's hard to escape the conclusion that books just aren't as central
to today's culture as movies, videogames and porn.
Reading today is an increasingly marginal activity. Within my own social
circle I know of very few people who are interested in books. Moving outward
from such a personal observation, there have been several prominent recent
essays on this rise in "aliteracy" among us. Michael Kinsley, a judge
for the American National Book Awards, was quite unabashed in declaring that he
hadn't read more than a small fraction of the nominated works (for a comment,
see here). In the Globe
and Mail this past month there appeared a lengthy essay on non-readers.
Writing in response, Russell Smith suggested that it wasn't our fault, that it
was today's literature that was failing to respond to the "trivial
present." This is an excellent point, slightly echoing Philip Marchand's
search for a native Toronto literature. But the larger problem is that
literature as an art form has found itself inadequate, or at least not as
effective, at describing - that great Modernist enterprise - "the way we
live now." For those interested in the trivial present the television and
the Internet beckon.
What we think of as literary fiction is a form of expression uncomfortably
suited to contemporary life. Of course this is a generalization, but I think
it's supported by the evidence of the huge popularity today of escapist novels
and the worst of genre pulp. (I say "worst" because the fact is much
genre fiction engages with contemporary concerns more than our dramatic fiction.
The vast bulk of it, however, is formulaic escapist trash.) This is the stuff
that's carrying the industry.
There are many bright shining exceptions to this gloomy situation, but I have
to be honest in admitting that my own tastes are tending more and more toward
non-fiction. A reviewer should be up front about these things. Thinking back on
the books I enjoyed the most this past year I came up with a list of titles that
included such journalistic investigations and exposes as Eric Schlosser's take
on the American food industry Fast Food Nation, Peter Biskind's account
of Hollywood in the 70s, Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, Adam Hochschild's
history of the exploitation of the Congo, King Leopold's Ghost, and
Barbara
Ehrenreich's investigative memoir of working-class life Nickel and Dimed.
I will end with my regular warning about how much I plan on cutting back this
coming year. Unless I win the lottery, I can't expect to keep going at this rate
indefinitely. As it is I am often reading books for review during 20-minute
breaks at work. This entire Year in Review essay has been written in less than
half an hour. My rants in the News
section are turning into unpremeditated sparks from the wheel. I don't even know
if I'm responding to all my e-mail.
That said, I do plan to stick around in one form or another. This site is a
great hobby, and it has introduced me to many interesting people. And if nothing
else, it is still an alternative to the media powers-that-be.
Best wishes for a safe and happy New Year,
Alex Good